OK, maybe just a teeny tiny little bit of collusion might have happened, mistakes were made, and it looks like an open crime scene with so much evidence and blood and hair everywhere that I do not know where to start. I was worried that Mueller was the whole ball game–but now the SDNY has so much to sort through that I feel there’s more than enough guilt to go around in multiple jurisdictions. Not to mention the next Attorney General of the great state of New York, the Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton! Well, maybe that wouldn’t be the best idea. How about Sally Yates? Or Zephyr Teachout? Can Preet Bharara handle the truth? Probably he could. And the acting AG, Barbara Underwood, looks just fine, and if NY state can close up the loophole regarding federal/state overlap and pardons, I feel much more confident than I did a week ago that the justice system has a fighting chance to bring the evildoers and crooks to account, whoever they may be. And glad to read that Robert Mueller was onto the Vekselberg-Michael Cohen payments months ago.
Rob Goldman, VP for ads @ Facebook, has weighed in on the Mueller indictments, media coverage thereof, and Facebook’s glorious “No Collusion! No Puppet!” role before, during, and after our 2016 election. Rob, you protest too much. Facebook is not the only bad actor and guilty party, no doubt. I am sure you are right that plenty of media coverage of Facebook’s role in the last election was less than 100% accurate. But did Facebook really share proprietary information on Russian ads with Mueller’s investigators out of a pure-hearted desire to “help the public understand how the Russians abused our system”? Your company is in large part the social media system. Mark Zuckerberg said after the election that the accusations against Facebook were all “crazy talk.” Are you old enough to remember that? You can say all you want that “swaying the election was *NOT* the main goal” of Russia, but sorry to say your words are far from “definitive.” Your point is apparently that disrupting and weakening our democracy was their main goal, thus the election was just a little detail. That’s a truly silly argument. Of course the cultivation of Trump, and Jill Stein, were means to an end, not ends in themselves. But if you think that excuses Facebook’s inattention and laxity, you are way off the mark.
P.S. Mr. Goldman does have a point that Finland, Sweden et al work hard at promoting a well-informed citizenry to keep Russian disinformation at bay. In the US we reacted to the breakup of the USSR by exhaling and fooling ourselves that Russia was a far-off problem we didn’t have to worry about anymore. Unless we lived in Alaska, we couldn’t see Russia from our window. Facebook or no Facebook, maybe we have learned better now. But critical thinking might still not be one of our national strong points, alas. Mr. Goldman writes “there are easy ways to fight [Russian trolls and bots]. Disinformation is ineffective against a well educated citizenry.” Education is “easy”? Really? Facebook and other Silicon Valley titans do promote better education in some ways, but are Facebook and Apple and Google willing to pay more taxes to support better education for all young people? Mr. Goldman links to an article referencing Finland’s “strong public education system.” Does Facebook support strong public education in the USA?
If there is a “coup” going on in America, from what direction is it coming? Is Robert Mueller, long-time Republican and Marine veteran, leading a leftist coup to oust Trump? Or is Fox News colluding with Vladimir Putin to destabilize our American democracy? Much closer to door #2, I would say. I am not sure exactly who is calling the tune, but Trump, Fox News, and most Republicans (or, as some say, Republirussians) are sure singing from the same nasty hymnbook. The rightwing noise machine is a feedback loop of attacks on Robert Mueller these days.
If Trump’s lawyers really think emails from the transition period between November 9, 2016 and January 20, 2017 were seized illegally by Mueller’s team, they have a remedy: file a motion with a Federal judge in DC. If they had any kind of valid legal case, they would have done that already.
If Robert Mueller were really trying to engineer a coup by relying on a team of corrupt pro-Hillary partisans, why did he get rid of the FBI agent who wrote those 2 am texts? Mueller got rid of the indiscreet and dubious agent. So what exactly is the problem? Senator Cornyn of Texas had no good answer when asked that question yesterday, though he did clear his throat and harrumph a while.
Republicans tried and pretty much succeeded in delegitimizing Lawrence Walsh’s investigation into the Iran-Contra scandal in the late nineteen-eighties (hat tip Charlie Pierce). Will Trump succeed in delegitimizing Mueller? Trump has something Reagan didn’t: Fox. He also has majorities in both houses of Congress, for now. Will Mueller turn out to have more conclusive evidence (and time to present it) than Walsh did? I think yes and who knows. Three days from now, if the tax bill passes, as seems likely, and Congress and the country get ready for Christmas and New Year’s, the situation becomes more volatile between Mueller and Trump. I would be very surprised if Trump went away quietly, but I also think Republicans in Congress would much rather have Pence as president.
When Putin calls Trump, does he give direct marching orders? Or is it more subtle and refined? What are the safe words? The safe words that may have been worked out in their hourlong meeting with no US translator or official present, in Europe, a few months ago, that was not disclosed by any US official but by Buzzfeed? And do they talk every few days? We have heard more about their phone calls from the Kremlin than from the State Department. Is Fox News looking into this? Putin is mighty white, which appeals to some people, but do the patriots who voted for Trump believe that our constitutional republic is in good hands with Putin as Trump’s case officer (as James Clapper said recently, and I don’t trust Clapper a whole lot, but he seems to have assessed Putin-Trump accurately)? Trump’s “national security strategy,” which he just presented on TV, does call out Russia and China to some extent, but Trump read those sections of the strategy report like a zombie, skipped some parts critical of Russia altogether, and only became animated when he spoke of collaboration with Putin. Collaboration is not necessarily collusion or criminal conspiracy, but sometimes smelling a whole lot of smoke ought to be enough evidence to flee the crime scene, eh?
Really, sir, no collusion? I believe you don’t recall much at all about it, last year was busy busy for all of us, but did you read the charging document for flippin’ Papadopoulos? And how about “the Professor?” (Nice touch of classiness there, bet he might have gone to an Ivy League college too, even if Russian).
It’s all very complicated, of course. Am hoping Putin will make bail for Manafort and Gates, and then explain everything to us with a press conference right quick. Or if he would just tell us what his Twitter bot number really is, I would be satisfied with that. Teeny tiny collusion, believe me.
The president has declared that he has “complete power to pardon,” which may be almost true in a narrow legal sense (asserting power to judge his own case is dubious). He may yet pardon his son, son-in-law, and who knows who else. He may be able to remove Robert Mueller, and that would be a major crisis if Congress did not respond forcefully. But the larger issue for a democratic republic in which consent of the governed is inalienable is this: what’s our next move as citizens? We who are citizens and voters have the final power to grant reprieves and pardons in the larger sense. Some of us, perhaps clinging to a confirmation bias, believe the president is trying to make things better, if only it weren’t for the swamp-dweller lobbyists/Democrats/leftists/snowflake slackers/deep state. Some of us, that is, are not yet ready to let go of our pleasant fantasy of victimhood, even when our political party controls the presidency, the House and Senate, and the highest court. Others of us, suffering from unpacified forgetting, are still fighting over the 2016 Democratic primaries. My hope is that most of us, who are hoping above all that the government will be focused on serving, protecting, and increasing opportunities for as many Americans as possible, will bother to let our representatives know how we feel, and then vote at every opportunity to renew and refresh our government, showing no reprieve and no pardon for those who have unrepentantly abused the public trust.
“Circumstantial evidence” is in the news today. As I heard it, Congressman Adam Schiff, Democrat of California, says he has evidence, not just circumstantial, of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians. Henry David Thoreau wrote that “some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.” I would say where we are right now re Trump/Russia is that we have seen the trout in the milk. Some people are anxious or eager for even more evidence. I imagine Schiff is sitting on evidence even stronger than trout in the milk. Not sure if it will impress or convince everybody who needs to be convinced and impressed, but there is already more than enough smoky milky trout for me.